Ask a Travel Nurse Housing Expert: How do I go about listing housing for Travel Nurses?

Share

Travel Nurse Housing For rent

Ask a Travel Nurse Housing Expert: How do I go about listing housing for Travel Nurses?

Ask a Travel Nurse Housing Expert Question:

I have a property that would be perfect for a Travel Nurse! But I am unsure how to best get the word out about it. How do I go about listing housing for Travel Nurses?

Ask a Travel Nurse Housing Expert Answer:

I would recommend that you get a flyer together and post it up at the hospitals located in proximity to your property. Additionally, speaking with Human Resources at those hospitals is a great way to get your information out there.

Make sure the flyer states things like size, furnished or unfurnished, washer/dryer, parking, A/C — all the specifics, the more the better — monthly rate, deposit requirement or any other fees, and if you are pet friendly.

I would also suggest that you contact the housing departments at some of the major Travel Nursing companies out there so they have your information on hand. And, you can also try a Travel Nursing forum like Healthcare Travelbook — which even has a specific housing and locations forum — to help spread the word among Travel Nurses.

Good luck!

Protect Your Practice: Insulin Administration in the Prison Setting

By Mathew Keller, RN JD, MNA Nurse Policy Specialist

We all know the five rights of medication administration: right patient, right route, right dose, right time, and right medication. Right documentation is often added as a sixth right.

But how can an RN give the right dose if she or he has not checked the patient’s blood glucose? In the clinical setting, blood glucose monitoring is often a delegated task. Whether the task is delegated to the patient or another properly trained assistive personnel is within the nurse’s discretion.

Diabetic items

Administering insulin based on an inmate’s self-reported blood glucose, however, presents an especially challenging ethical dilemma for  nurses in a prison setting. On the one hand is the nurse’s duty to respect the patient’s autonomy. On the other hand is the nurse’s duty of beneficence and non-maleficence to that patient. And, of course, don’t forget that you can’t help other patients if you no longer have your license.

There are several avenues available to the Board of Nursing to discipline an RN who improperly administers medication due to an incorrectly reported blood glucose level.

Never forget that under the Nurse Practice Act, you and only you, are accountable for the quality of care delivered;  [1] that discipline can result from failure to conform to “the minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing professional… nursing practice;” [2] and that the five rights of medication administration are minimum standards of acceptable nursing practice.

Adhering to the five rights for administration of insulin requires that the nurse has 100 percent confidence in the reported blood glucose in order to fulfill the “right dose” requirement. “Delegating… a nursing function or a prescribed healthcare function when the delegation… could reasonably be expected to result in unsafe or ineffective patient care” [3] is also grounds for discipline, including delegation of blood glucose monitoring.

If you, as an RN, have complete confidence in the self-reported blood glucose of an inmate, great. It is within your discretion to administer insulin to that patient. But please keep in mind that if you are ever wrong, if the inmate ever incorrectly self-reports, reports a blood glucose from six hours ago, or simply used improper methods to check his or her blood glucose, then you will fail to administer the right dose of medication.

Because of this, I highly advise all MNA members who work in prisons facing this issue to protect your license by having the inmate check his or her blood glucose in front of you. Checking the history of the blood glucose monitor is simply not enough: blood glucose results can be manipulated, perhaps in the way they are taken, perhaps in the device’s settings or time, perhaps in ways we are not even aware of.

Remember that you are accountable for the care you deliver, that the right dose requires you to know the right blood glucose, and that delegating a nursing function that could result in unsafe patient care is grounds for discipline.


 

[1]MN Statute § 148.171 Subd. 15(17)

[2]MN Statute § 148.261 Subd. 1(6)

[3] MN Statute § 148.261 Subd. 1(8)

California Audit Finds Backlog Of 11,000 Nursing Home Investigations

California’s public health department has failed to adequately manage investigations of nursing homes statewide, resulting in a backlog of more than 11,000 complaints – many involving serious safety risks to patients, according to an audit released Thursday.

California State Auditor Elaine M. Howle found that the complaints had been open for a year on average – a time frame she called unreasonable and “very concerning.” Nearly 370 open complaints arose from situations that put patients in “immediate jeopardy,” meaning they caused or were likely to cause serious injury or death, according to the review, which looked at cases open as of April 2014. In the Los Angeles County district, 65 immediate jeopardy complaints were open an average of 514 days.

The public health department, which is responsible for ensuring safety for residents at more than 2,500 facilities statewide, doesn’t require investigations to be completed within a certain time, leading to wide discrepancies from office to office, according to the audit.

“Holding district offices accountable for promptly completing investigations is critical to ensuring the safety and well-being of the residents in long-term health care facilities,” Howle wrote in the 82-page report.

State public health officials said in a written statement that they would be reporting on their progress to the auditor. “We appreciate the opportunity to improve our operation,” the statement read.

The state audit was prompted in part by Kaiser Health News reports that the Los Angeles County Public Health Department was ordering inspectors to close cases without fully investigating them. The reports, published by the Los Angeles News Group, also led to a critical county audit.

The state auditor found that the quality of investigations was inconsistent across California. For example, inspectors in the San Francisco office closed cases without having them reviewed by supervisors as required, the report said. And inspectors elsewhere failed to follow state laws requiring investigations to begin within 10 days. In one Sacramento case involving a 97-year-old resident who fell, the inspector didn’t begin the investigation until nine months later.

Mariko Yamada, a member of the state assembly who requested the audit, called the nursing home investigation process “mangled” and said the department has failed to do its job to protect some of the state’s most vulnerable residents. As many as 300,000 residents in California receive care each year in the facilities.

“There has been almost a culture of indifference,” she said in an interview.

The audit found particular problems with investigations into incidents reported to the state by the facilities themselves. In Orange County and most of Los Angeles County, for instance, the inspectors performed on-site investigations in less than 20 percent of such cases reported in 2012 and 2013.

In general, when inspectors found problems at nursing homes, they didn’t always follow up within the required time to ensure the facilities filed plans to fix the problems, according to the audit.

The audit recommended that the department establish a formal process to monitor investigations into open complaints and incidents reported by the homes and that it set a time frame for their completion. The auditor also urged that the department determine how many inspectors are necessary to reduce the backlog and keep up with new complaints.  The department has repeatedly said that it lacks enough resources.

In a response to the audit, state Public Health Department Director Ron Chapman pledged to increase supervision of the district offices, noting that the state already had made improvements to its oversight of Los Angeles County. But the department said that it did not agree with the auditor’s recommendation to set a firm timeline for finishing cases, saying instead that it would work to improve timeliness.

The findings didn’t come as a surprise to Joe Rodrigues, the long-term care ombudsman for the state. Rodrigues said there has long been “questionable oversight and management” of the department’s licensing and certification division.

“It is a flawed system,” he said. “It isn’t doing everything it can do to protect residents.”

Carole Herman, president of the Foundation Aiding the Elderly, agreed. The number of open complaints is “horrific, “she said.

“How many reports are there going to have to be before the governor and the legislature pay attention?” she said.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

UPDATE: Board/Labor Election and Consent to Serve

2015 Joint Board & Labor Council Election and Consent to Serve

DEADLINE EXTENDED: The deadline to submit your consent to serve form has been extended until November 14, 2015.

Are you interested in serving on the Alaska Nurses Association Board of Directors and Labor Council? Elections are quickly approaching! AaNA is in need of individuals to fill five joint seats on the Board and Labor Council. Please select the appropriate form below to fill out and return to AaNA by November 14, 2014.


Board of Directors & Labor Council Positions

Board Vice President / Labor Council Director
Open to any Alaskan Registered Nurse who is a member of an AaNA Bargaining Unit
Term January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2016

Board Labor Council Designee / Labor Council Director
Open to any Alaskan Registered Nurse who is a member of an AaNA Bargaining Unit
Term January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2016

Board Director At Large / Labor Council Director
Open to any Alaskan Registered Nurse who is a member of an AaNA Bargaining Unit
Term January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2016

Board Director At Large / Labor Council Director
Open to any Alaskan Registered Nurse who is a member of an AaNA Bargaining Unit
Term January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2016

Board Director At Large / Labor Council Director
Open to any Alaskan Registered Nurse who is a member of an AaNA Bargaining Unit
Term January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2016

Download the Consent to Serve form here.

Please submit Consent to Serve form to Andrea Nutty by November 14, 2014.

Please contact Andrea Nutty – andrea@aknurse.org – with any questions.

For Families With Mixed Immigration Status, Health Insurance Can Be Puzzling

Jessica Bravo walks house-to-house in the piercing Southern California heat. Over and over, at doorsteps around Orange County, she asks the same question: “Are you insured?”

Getting an answer isn’t always easy. Doors slam in her face. She gets shooed from porches. And sometimes people cut her off mid-spiel.

Bravo is a paid health outreach worker for the Orange County Congregation Community Organization, a faith-based nonprofit. Her job is to inform people about getting health insurance under the nation’s landmark health law, the Affordable Care Act.

“A lot of people don’t know about this new law … this opportunity for health insurance,” said Bravo, a 19-year old Costa Mesa resident.

Until a few months ago, Bravo didn’t actually know coverage was an opportunity for her, as well.

She is an undocumented immigrant from Mexico. Most people without papers can’t get health insurance under the ACA. But last year, Bravo and her 21-year-old brother Daniel qualified for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program – a 2012 initiative that grants temporary legal status to certain undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children.

The law applies to people who came to the U.S. before turning 16, are in school or a high school graduate and are now under the age of 33.

They can obtain a work permit, a driver’s license, a Social Security number, a two-year reprieve from deportation and — as Bravo now realizes — the opportunity to get health insurance through Medi-Cal, California’s insurance program for poor and disabled people.   Only a few other states offer similar options.

Now studying politics and ethnic studies full time at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, Bravo can’t work as much as she used to. Her monthly income of $960 likely would make her eligible for Medi-Cal.

Figuring out her options under the law was especially difficult for Bravo, whose family is of “mixed status.” That is, some have federal authorization to be in this country and others don’t.  While anyone can buy insurance privately, people without legal status are not allowed to buy insurance on the exchange or participate in most government program such as Medicare, non-emergency Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Her parents are in the country without permission, as is her older brother Luis, 22, who did not qualify for DACA. Her other brother Daniel, 21, was granted DACA status and qualifies for the same benefits she does. And her brother Alex, 11, is a U.S.-born citizen, covered through California Kids – a nonprofit health insurance plan.

‘Stuck In The Middle’

The family’s history is complicated. After several failed visa attempts, her father Enrique Bravo crossed the border illegally in 1996. His wife, Virginia, tried to cross by hiding in a car but was caught by border patrol agents. Desperate to join her husband, she tried again and made it across six months later. Three-year-old Jessica and her older brothers later crossed with legal-resident relatives in a car.

“I’m 100 percent Mexican…but all my memories growing up are from the United States,” said Jessica. “It’s like I’m stuck in the middle…I’m neither from here or there.”

As the older children grew up, getting health care proved dicey. The family tried to stay below the radar. This meant visiting the doctor only when absolutely necessary — and always paying cash.

They were, like many immigrants, fearful of exposing the family’s unauthorized status and risking deportation, for themselves and their children.

Eventually Enrique, an electrician, found a job that offered health insurance, and for several years the family was insured. But he got laid off in 2006. From then on, they were forced to rely on local community clinics that provide care on a sliding pay scale.

“I remember my parents telling me that I was no longer going to be insured under their plan,” said Jessica. “I just tried to eat healthy.”

Her biggest concern now, she says, is that one of the others will get sick and the family won’t be able to pay for care.

“Even though that fear is gone for me, it’s still very real for my family,” said Bravo, who is in the process of renewing her DACA status for another two years.

“It’s difficult to grasp that I have this privilege, yet my parents who worked twice as hard, don’t have anything.”

Recent events have compounded the family’s worries.

Jessica’s brother Luis was recently detained by agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a result of a tip arising from a prior conviction for driving under the influence. It’s unclear what will happen until the immigration court hears his case and decides whether he can remain in the U.S.

“It all seems like a dream…it happened so fast,” said Jessica. “We’re doing everything we can to stop his deportation.”

One Fall Can Change Everything

Weeks ago, Jessica’s mother Virginia stumbled and fell to the ground in front of their Costa Mesa apartment, spilling the milk she’d just bought. The 48-year-old former hairstylist hurt her arm, but despite feeling a sharp pain she won’t be visiting the emergency room.

“We can’t afford it,” Virginia Bravo said. The mother of four has been unemployed for over a year and is more concerned about stocking the empty refrigerator than seeking treatment.

She knows all too well that without insurance an unexpected injury could leave them bankrupt.

Last year, Enrique had to be rushed to the emergency room. He woke up in the middle of the night with extreme paranoia, unable to catch his breath, and feeling numb.

He was having a panic attack. The bill for the two-hour hospital stay was about $6,000. Already struggling financially, the family had to find a way to pay cash.

“At first I refused to go to the hospital,” he said. “I knew it would be expensive.”

The 44-year-old says he struggles to earn at least $2,250 each month as a self-employed electrician – the exact amount he needs to pay rent.

Any extra money is used to buy food and pay bills. Saving for an emergency is impossible, the family members said.

“We’re poor, but rich in health and family unity,” Virginia Bravo said.

Living in a mixed-status family has been challenging, but it has also brought them closer, she said. The whole family has been involved in campaigning for immigration reform and hopes the ACA will eventually include coverage for undocumented immigrants.

“People don’t know what we had to go through to get here,” said Virginia. “We made it across … we’re the lucky ones.”

“We don’t want anything for free,” she said. “If we had an opportunity to buy health insurance, we would find a way to pay for it.”

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Lack Of Understanding About Insurance Could Lead To Poor Choices

They know less than they think they know. That’s the finding of a recent study that evaluated people’s confidence about choosing and using health insurance compared with their actual knowledge and skills.

As people shop for health coverage this fall, the gap between perception and reality could lead them to choose plans that don’t meet their needs, the researchers suggest.

“There’s a concern that people who don’t have much experience with health insurance don’t protect themselves financially, and then something happens,” says Kathryn Paez, a principal researcher at the American Institutes for Research who co-authored the study. “So they’re learning through hard knocks.”

The nationally representative survey of 828 people aged 22 to 64 is part of a project to develop a standardized questionnaire that researchers, health plans and providers can use to assess people’s health insurance literacy.

The study found, for example, that while three-quarters of Americans say they’re confident they know how to use health insurance, only 20 percent could correctly calculate how much they would owe for a routine physician visit. Many people don’t understand commonly used terms such as “out-of-pocket costs,” “HMO” and “PPO,” according to the study.

The study also found that certain groups of people tended to have a tougher time using health insurance, including young people, minorities, those with lower income or educational levels and those who used health care services infrequently.

People who visit the doctor occasionally but have never been hospitalized or visited the emergency room may be overconfident they understand how health insurance works, says Paez. Likewise, people who belong to integrated health care systems where providers are generally on staff may not realize the potential complications of in-network and out-of-network coverage, among other things, she says.

More comprehensive education could help close the gap between what people think they know about health insurance and what they actually know. In the meantime, the issue brief about the study includes a consumer checklist to aid consumers in choosing a plan.

Please contact Kaiser Health News to send comments or ideas for future topics for the Insuring Your Health column.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Know your rights on Election Day – and use them!

Be prepared when you vote on Nov. 4 – know who you’re voting for and know your rights before you get to the polls.

MNA has endorsed candidates for Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, State Auditor, and the Minnesota House who support nurses and important issues like safe patient standards. The list is on MNA’s website.

Nurses vote 2014

There’s still time to get involved and make sure those people are elected. You can make phone calls or knock on the doors of voters who share our values but need a push and a little information to get them to vote. A list of opportunities is on MNA’s website.

Your Voting Rights
Did you know that you are entitled to paid time off in order to vote in the Nov. 4 elections?

Under state law, “every employee who is eligible to vote in an election has the right to be absent from work for the time necessary to appear at the employee’s polling place, cast a ballot, and return to work… without penalty or deduction from salary or wages because of the absence.” Employers are not allowed to refuse or interfere with this right, directly or indirectly, and cannot require you to use personal or vacation time.  Any employer, manager, or supervisor who interferes with the right to vote is guilty of a misdemeanor under the law.

Please visit the Minnesota Secretary of State’s MNVotes website for information on your rights and a sample letter to provide to your employer.

Voting Early
Why wait until Election Day to vote?  Absentee ballots are available now, even if you are not yet registered to vote.  Thanks to a new law authored by Rep. Steve Simon (MNA’s endorsed candidate for Secretary of State), any Minnesota voter can vote absentee without an excuse, essentially creating early voting for anyone who wants it.

There is still time to vote in person at your county election office.  Visit MNVotes to learn more.

CDC Guidance vs Quarantine

The American Nurses Association (ANA) opposes the mandatory quarantine of health care professionals who return to the United States from West African nations where Ebola is widespread. ANA supports registered nurse Kaci Hickox, who recently returned to the United States after treating Ebola patients in Sierra Leone, in her challenge of a 21-day quarantine imposed by state officials in Maine, her home state. Hickox arrived at Newark airport on Oct. 24 and was immediately quarantined in a hospital tent by New Jersey state officials, who eventually allowed her to travel to Maine via private transport on Oct. 27. After testing negative twice for Ebola, nurse Hickox, who continues to be symptom free, poses no public threat yet is restricted to her home.

ANA, along with the American Hospital Association and American Medical Association, supports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidance based on the best available scientific evidence. The CDC guidance would not require a mandatory 21-day quarantine of Hickox given risk levels outlined by the CDC in her particular case. ANA urges authorities to refrain from imposing more restrictive conditions than indicated in the CDC guidelines, which will only raise the level of fear and misinformation that currently exists.

ANA supports a policy of appropriate monitoring for health care workers who have cared for or been in contact with patients with Ebola. Those who are not exhibiting symptoms of illness consistent with Ebola do not require quarantine. Monitoring should follow recommendations outlined by the CDC based on risk levels and the presence or absence of symptoms, including regular monitoring of body temperature and oversight by a public health agency. If symptoms do occur, the appropriate next step is isolation and transport to a medical facility for further evaluation. ANA seeks to balance protection of public health and safety with individual liberties. Policies to protect the public from the transmission of Ebola must be based on evidence and science, not fear.

Mandatory quarantine for individuals who do not have symptoms or risk factors is not backed by science. Such actions undermine efforts to recruit sufficient numbers of volunteer nurses and other health care professionals, who are essential to help contain the spread of the disease in West Africa.

ANA’s position emphasizing evidence and science as the foundation for decision-making extends to proposals to ban travel to the United States from West African nations affected by the Ebola outbreak. There is no evidence to suggest that a travel ban would be effective; public health experts oppose it. In fact, a ban could be counterproductive, encouraging individuals to try to circumvent reporting and other systems. ANA supports the current requirement that those traveling to the U.S. from affected nations in West Africa, including health care professionals who have provided care to Ebola patients, once they have passed initial screening, engage in monitoring according to CDC guidelines and reporting to their respective public health agencies.”

Statement: Attributable to ANA President Pamela Cipriano, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN

ANA is the only full-service professional organization representing the interests of the nation’s 3.1 million registered nurses through its constituent and state nurses associations and its organizational affiliates. ANA advances the nursing profession by fostering high standards of nursing practice, promoting the rights of nurses in the workplace, projecting a positive and realistic view of nursing, and by lobbying the Congress and regulatory agencies on health care issues affecting nurses and the public.