Know your rights on Election Day – and use them!

Be prepared when you vote on Nov. 4 – know who you’re voting for and know your rights before you get to the polls.

MNA has endorsed candidates for Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, State Auditor, and the Minnesota House who support nurses and important issues like safe patient standards. The list is on MNA’s website.

Nurses vote 2014

There’s still time to get involved and make sure those people are elected. You can make phone calls or knock on the doors of voters who share our values but need a push and a little information to get them to vote. A list of opportunities is on MNA’s website.

Your Voting Rights
Did you know that you are entitled to paid time off in order to vote in the Nov. 4 elections?

Under state law, “every employee who is eligible to vote in an election has the right to be absent from work for the time necessary to appear at the employee’s polling place, cast a ballot, and return to work… without penalty or deduction from salary or wages because of the absence.” Employers are not allowed to refuse or interfere with this right, directly or indirectly, and cannot require you to use personal or vacation time.  Any employer, manager, or supervisor who interferes with the right to vote is guilty of a misdemeanor under the law.

Please visit the Minnesota Secretary of State’s MNVotes website for information on your rights and a sample letter to provide to your employer.

Voting Early
Why wait until Election Day to vote?  Absentee ballots are available now, even if you are not yet registered to vote.  Thanks to a new law authored by Rep. Steve Simon (MNA’s endorsed candidate for Secretary of State), any Minnesota voter can vote absentee without an excuse, essentially creating early voting for anyone who wants it.

There is still time to vote in person at your county election office.  Visit MNVotes to learn more.

CDC Guidance vs Quarantine

The American Nurses Association (ANA) opposes the mandatory quarantine of health care professionals who return to the United States from West African nations where Ebola is widespread. ANA supports registered nurse Kaci Hickox, who recently returned to the United States after treating Ebola patients in Sierra Leone, in her challenge of a 21-day quarantine imposed by state officials in Maine, her home state. Hickox arrived at Newark airport on Oct. 24 and was immediately quarantined in a hospital tent by New Jersey state officials, who eventually allowed her to travel to Maine via private transport on Oct. 27. After testing negative twice for Ebola, nurse Hickox, who continues to be symptom free, poses no public threat yet is restricted to her home.

ANA, along with the American Hospital Association and American Medical Association, supports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidance based on the best available scientific evidence. The CDC guidance would not require a mandatory 21-day quarantine of Hickox given risk levels outlined by the CDC in her particular case. ANA urges authorities to refrain from imposing more restrictive conditions than indicated in the CDC guidelines, which will only raise the level of fear and misinformation that currently exists.

ANA supports a policy of appropriate monitoring for health care workers who have cared for or been in contact with patients with Ebola. Those who are not exhibiting symptoms of illness consistent with Ebola do not require quarantine. Monitoring should follow recommendations outlined by the CDC based on risk levels and the presence or absence of symptoms, including regular monitoring of body temperature and oversight by a public health agency. If symptoms do occur, the appropriate next step is isolation and transport to a medical facility for further evaluation. ANA seeks to balance protection of public health and safety with individual liberties. Policies to protect the public from the transmission of Ebola must be based on evidence and science, not fear.

Mandatory quarantine for individuals who do not have symptoms or risk factors is not backed by science. Such actions undermine efforts to recruit sufficient numbers of volunteer nurses and other health care professionals, who are essential to help contain the spread of the disease in West Africa.

ANA’s position emphasizing evidence and science as the foundation for decision-making extends to proposals to ban travel to the United States from West African nations affected by the Ebola outbreak. There is no evidence to suggest that a travel ban would be effective; public health experts oppose it. In fact, a ban could be counterproductive, encouraging individuals to try to circumvent reporting and other systems. ANA supports the current requirement that those traveling to the U.S. from affected nations in West Africa, including health care professionals who have provided care to Ebola patients, once they have passed initial screening, engage in monitoring according to CDC guidelines and reporting to their respective public health agencies.”

Statement: Attributable to ANA President Pamela Cipriano, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN

ANA is the only full-service professional organization representing the interests of the nation’s 3.1 million registered nurses through its constituent and state nurses associations and its organizational affiliates. ANA advances the nursing profession by fostering high standards of nursing practice, promoting the rights of nurses in the workplace, projecting a positive and realistic view of nursing, and by lobbying the Congress and regulatory agencies on health care issues affecting nurses and the public.

CDC Guidance vs Quarantine

The American Nurses Association (ANA) opposes the mandatory quarantine of health care professionals who return to the United States from West African nations where Ebola is widespread. ANA supports registered nurse Kaci Hickox, who recently returned to the United States after treating Ebola patients in Sierra Leone, in her challenge of a 21-day quarantine imposed by state officials in Maine, her home state. Hickox arrived at Newark airport on Oct. 24 and was immediately quarantined in a hospital tent by New Jersey state officials, who eventually allowed her to travel to Maine via private transport on Oct. 27. After testing negative twice for Ebola, nurse Hickox, who continues to be symptom free, poses no public threat yet is restricted to her home.

ANA, along with the American Hospital Association and American Medical Association, supports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidance based on the best available scientific evidence. The CDC guidance would not require a mandatory 21-day quarantine of Hickox given risk levels outlined by the CDC in her particular case. ANA urges authorities to refrain from imposing more restrictive conditions than indicated in the CDC guidelines, which will only raise the level of fear and misinformation that currently exists.

ANA supports a policy of appropriate monitoring for health care workers who have cared for or been in contact with patients with Ebola. Those who are not exhibiting symptoms of illness consistent with Ebola do not require quarantine. Monitoring should follow recommendations outlined by the CDC based on risk levels and the presence or absence of symptoms, including regular monitoring of body temperature and oversight by a public health agency. If symptoms do occur, the appropriate next step is isolation and transport to a medical facility for further evaluation. ANA seeks to balance protection of public health and safety with individual liberties. Policies to protect the public from the transmission of Ebola must be based on evidence and science, not fear.

Mandatory quarantine for individuals who do not have symptoms or risk factors is not backed by science. Such actions undermine efforts to recruit sufficient numbers of volunteer nurses and other health care professionals, who are essential to help contain the spread of the disease in West Africa.

ANA’s position emphasizing evidence and science as the foundation for decision-making extends to proposals to ban travel to the United States from West African nations affected by the Ebola outbreak. There is no evidence to suggest that a travel ban would be effective; public health experts oppose it. In fact, a ban could be counterproductive, encouraging individuals to try to circumvent reporting and other systems. ANA supports the current requirement that those traveling to the U.S. from affected nations in West Africa, including health care professionals who have provided care to Ebola patients, once they have passed initial screening, engage in monitoring according to CDC guidelines and reporting to their respective public health agencies.”

Statement: Attributable to ANA President Pamela Cipriano, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN

ANA is the only full-service professional organization representing the interests of the nation’s 3.1 million registered nurses through its constituent and state nurses associations and its organizational affiliates. ANA advances the nursing profession by fostering high standards of nursing practice, promoting the rights of nurses in the workplace, projecting a positive and realistic view of nursing, and by lobbying the Congress and regulatory agencies on health care issues affecting nurses and the public.

Oregon Has A Shortage Of Certified Medical Interpreters

PORTLAND — Interpreting from one language to another is a tricky business, and when it comes to interpreting between a doctor and patient, the stakes are even higher.

Consider the story of 18-year-old baseball player Willie Ramirez.

Ramirez was taken to a South Florida hospital in a coma, says Oregon certified medical interpreter Helen Eby. “His family apparently used the word ‘intoxicado’ to talk about this person,” she says. “Well, ‘intoxicado’ in Spanish just means that you ingested something. It could be food, it could be a drug, it could be anything that has made you sick.”

But, Eby continues, “the interpreter interpreted this as ‘intoxicated’ so the doctor immediately made a diagnosis of drug overdose. They had him in the hospital for two days before they figured out they should call in a neurologist and found that he had a couple of hematomas in his brain. The guy ended up quadriplegic.”

Eby says doctors and hospitals also often turn to a family member for help, but that can be problematic, too.

“You know, you’ve got a 10-year-old in a gynecology appointment. Is this where you would normally take a 10-year-old?” she says.  “Not likely. Or have a child, an adult child even, interpret a parent’s cancer diagnosis. That’s got to be highly traumatic.”

Thirteen years ago, the state of Oregon recognized the problem and required doctors and hospitals to start using interpreters. The Affordable Care Act also broadens what hospitals and insurers are required to translate for people who don’t speak English.

But even more than a decade after the state law has been on the books, it still poses challenges in Oregon. Many hospitals and doctors turned to a phone service, where they can quickly get help in several languages.

But the people who work for those language services often aren’t certified medical interpreters, and that can lead to difficulties.

Isidro Hernandes is 48 and lives in Cornelius, in Oregon’s fertile Willamette Valley. Recently, he was a patient at Hillsboro’s Tuality Hospital.

The 48-year-old landscaper was at work when he started to feel a tightness in his chest. He’s feeling better now that his heart problems are being addressed, but speaking through interpreter Armando Jinenez, Hernandes says he prefers in-person interpreters to those on the phone.

“A lot of times the over-the-phone interpreter can’t see what you’re doing, can’t describe or relay that message. And sometimes they might have errors or mistakes in communications,” Jinenez relays in English for Hernandes.

Tuality Hospital has been using a phone service to provide qualified interpreters, but the director of corporate communications, Gerry Ewing, says they’re planning to use more in-person interpreters.

“We’re trying to reflect the demographics of our community, which is changing rapidly,” he says.  “Washington County is around 25 percent Hispanic, so we need to reflect that in the services we provide our patients.”

Hernandes’ doctor, Angela Alday, says that five to 20 percent of her patients require an interpreter. She said the hospital encourages her to use a phone service when necessary, which she does. But she says sometimes, when dealing with a touchy issue, she will use a family member.

“One problem that I run into with the translator phone is a lot of our elderly patients seem to be kind of confused by it,” Alday says. “You know some of them don’t hear very well so that can be a problem. And then, particularly if the patient has dementia, sometimes using the telephone translator is confusing. They don’t know what’s going on. But I feel like if there’s a family member standing there beside them, then they understand more what’s happening.”

She’s pleased the hospital is planning to use more in-person interpreters in the future.

Oregon has about 3,500 medical interpreters. But Eby says only 32 are certified and another 64 qualified, “So you have a three percent chance of getting a qualified or certified interpreter in Oregon right now,” she says. “That’s pretty low, in my opinion.”

It takes a long time and costs a lot of money to become certified, she adds. And after a person goes through all that training, they find they can make more money and have a more stable lifestyle in another career, like translation for court reporting. That’s because medical interpreters tend to be consultants and don’t get paid to travel. The hours can also be sparse and sporadic.

But Eby remains hopeful. Now that the Affordable Care Act is penalizing hospitals for readmissions, such a reduction in errors could save them significant sums.

A 2012 study by the American College of Emergency Physicians looked at interpreter errors. It found that the error rate was significantly lower for professional interpreters than for ad hoc interpreters — 12 percent as opposed to 22 percent. And for professionals with more than 100 hours of training, errors dropped to 2 percent.

Oregon’s Office of Equity and Inclusion plans to increase training and add 150 new interpreters in the next two years.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.