Cleveland Clinic Reports 40% Drop In Charity Care After Medicaid Expansion

The Cleveland Clinic, one of the largest hospitals in the country, has cut its charity care spending — or the cost of free care provided to patients who can’t afford to pay — to $101 million in 2014 compared with $171 million in 2013.

Hospital officials credited the federal health law for the improvement. “The decrease in charity care is primarily attributable to the increase in Medicaid patients due to the expansion of Medicaid eligibility in the State of Ohio and the resulting decrease in the number of charity patients,” the hospital’s year-end financial statement reported.

That 40 percent drop spotlights a trend in how payments are changing for all providers since the health law rolled out the Medicaid expansion and subsidies that help some lower-income people purchase policies on the new insurance marketplaces, said John Palmer, spokesperson for Ohio Hospital Association.

“Now that you’re starting to see that shift from uninsured or underserved on over into health care programs such as Medicaid and the exchange, that has had a good impact,” he said. “And, obviously, it is reflective of what hospitals are experiencing with uncompensated care in the areas of charity care especially.”

The clinic is not alone. The federal Department of Health and Human Services announced last week that the number of uninsured and self-pay patients has fallen substantially in Medicaid expansion states since the program went into effect last year. In addition, states with expansion saw significant reductions in uncompensated care costs – which includes charity care and bad debt, such as when an insured patient doesn’t pay her share of a hospital bill. Hospitals in those states had an estimated savings of $2.6 billion over that seen in non-expansion states.

Even so, Moody’s Investors Service released a negative outlook for the nation’s nonprofit health care sector. It pointed out that while the increased insured population will funnel dollars into the hospitals, that may not make up for federal cuts in Medicare and other programs.

Ohio is one of 28 states and the District of Columbia to expand Medicaid under the federal health law. More than 492,000 Ohio residents have enrolled through expansion. In addition, another 234,341 people in the state selected or were automatically re-enrolled in a private plan on the state’s federally run exchange.

“This has been good for patients because now they are insured through the State of Ohio’s adoption of Medicaid Expansion and can go anywhere for the care they need,” a spokeswoman wrote via email.

Another financial report, released by the clinic in early March, indicates that total uncompensated care fell 27 percent to $211 million in 2014. That number includes both charity care and bad debt costs.

The clinic, however, announced in the earlier March report that 2014 was an “extraordinary” financial year with operating income up 60 percent to $466 million on total revenues of $6.7 billion.

Dr. Toby Cosgrove, the clinic’s chief executive, noted then that the economic improvement came from a reduction in expenses, with cuts in energy use, employee health insurance costs and staff.

“Everybody in the organization contributed from whether we were turning off the escalators at night or not doing duplication of lab studies,” Cosgrove said. “But it was a total organization involvement in this and it was very gratifying to see people step to the plate.”

This story is part of a partnership that includes WCPN/Ideastream, NPR and Kaiser Health News.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

RNs Rally in Support of Hospital Workplace Violence Regulations

“Hospitals say they are doing enough to protect nurses from violence, but they don’t have a plan,” said California Nurses Association Co-president Melinda Markowitz, RN.

 

 

Markowitz kicked off a press conference Wednesday in front of the Harris State Building, where over 50 RNs gathered for the final public hearing on new California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) hospital workplace violence regulations. The nurses were there to show continued support for the regulations, as they move toward finalization in 2016, and to advocate—along the way—for the highest level of protections.

 

“Hospitals chronically understaff the facilities, which leaves nurses vulnerable to violence. That’s unacceptable, and that’s going to change,” Markowitz emphasized.

 

The upcoming regulations are the result of a CNA-sponsored bill, SB 1299—the Healthcare Workplace Violence Prevention Act—which was signed in 2014 by California Governor Jerry Brown. The bill mandates that hospitals have a comprehensive workplace violence prevention plan; Cal/OSHA’s regulations will implement the law.

 

After the rally, RNs filed into the Harris State Building, in a show of support during the public hearing itself. Several CNA nurses opened the meeting with personal testimony.

 

 

“Not once in the years that I’ve worked at California Pacific Medical Center have we been offered any adequate training on recognizing potential violent situations—or on demonstrating and practicing techniques to diffuse, deescalate or manage these all–too-common occurrences,” said Amy Erb, RN. “The culture in our workplace is one of complacency and indifference by management and administration. So we are here to show support for the strongest regulations that would hold hospitals and other healthcare facilities accountable for implementing a violence prevention plan.”

 

Mike Hill, RN, of Sutter Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, also spoke at the hearing. Sharing a personal account of violence in his facility, he explained that after a physical altercation between two families in the neonatal intensive care unit, a lack of staffing and adequate protocols caused a dangerous delay in addressing the violence.

 

“Despite security being called, the nurses and doctors had to break up the altercation. Police also had to be called because there were not enough security staff available,” said Hill. “This has become the norm, as nurses feel they are on their own in fighting this violence. These regulations emphasize prevention, which is the key.”

 

RNs cite the prevention aspect of California’s current legislation as a model for the nation.

 

 

“These draft regulations set a model for the rest of the country by emphasizing prevention. Some states emphasize criminalizing perpetrators, who are often mentally unstable patients, but we don’t believe locking up more mentally ill people is the answer,” says Markowitz. “It is the responsibility of hospitals to stop violence from happening in the first place.”

 

Nurses also laud the comprehensive nature of the proposed regulations, which cover healthcare workers working in any location where healthcare is being provided, including retail settings and out in the community-at-large (in the case of public health nurses).

 

With final input gathered, draft regulations will then move on toward finalization in 2016.

 

See Complete Picture Set Here