Pet-friendly State Parks for Travel Nurses

Share

Pet-friendly State Parks for Travel Nurses

Have an awesome adventure with your best friend at one of these pet-friendly state parks for Travel Nurses!

For many Travel Nurses, whether to bring your pet on assignment or not is not even a question. Of course you want to hit the road with your best pal(s)!

Studies have shown that pet owners often cope better with new or difficult situations, making traveling with your pet good for your spirit and performance.

So, luckily, there are pet-friendly Travel Nursing agencies that will make traveling with your pets easier for you. But even though a pet-friendly company can help you with housing and other resources to make you and your pet happy on the road, once you arrive at your new location it can be a challenge locating dog parks or other good spots to go play with your pet(s) when you don’t know .

So I totally thought of you pet-loving Travel Nurses, when I saw a recent Roadtrippers post that shares some really great information about pet-friendly state parks. For Travel Nurses, it offers lots of great opportunities for pet-friendly fun and sightseeing with your pet on the road in Texas, New York, South Carolina, Kentucky, Utah, Alabama, Arizona, California and other locations.

Click here to learn more about some of these great pet-friendly state parks for Travel Nurses. And, bonus, you’ll also find a discount code for Rover.com where you can get a free night of pet-sitting!

Do you know of any great pet-friendly state parks for Travel Nurses? Share your faves in the comments!

 

Feds Say That In Screening Colonoscopies, Anesthesia Comes With No Charge

Earlier this week the federal government clarified that insurers can’t charge people for anesthesia administered during a free colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer. That’s good news for consumers, some of whom have been charged hundreds of dollars for anesthesia after undergoing what they thought would be a free test. But the government guidance leaves important questions unanswered.

Under the health law, most health plans have to provide care that’s recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force without charging members anything out of pocket. The only exception is for plans that have grandfathered status under the law.

That task force, a nonpartisan group of medical experts, recommends that starting at age 50 people periodically receive either a colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood test to screen for colorectal cancer.

Most people are anesthetized during a colonoscopy, in which a flexible tube with a camera at the end is inserted into the rectum and snaked through the large intestine to look for polyps and other abnormalities.

Although the health law made it clear that the colonoscopy itself must be free for patients, it didn’t spell out how anesthesia or other charges should be handled.

That lack of clarity allowed insurers to argue at first that if polyps were identified and removed during the colonoscopy, the procedure was no longer a screening test and patients could be billed. In 2013, regulators clarified that patients couldn’t be charged for polyps removed during a screening colonoscopy because it was an integral part of the procedure.

With this week’s guidance, the government has made it clear that consumers don’t have to pick up the tab for anesthesia during a colonoscopy either.

But other questions remain. Consumers may still find themselves on the hook for facility or pathology charges related to a screening colonoscopy, according to an email from Anna Howard, a policy principal at the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, and Mary Doroshenk, director of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

In addition, cost sharing rules are unclear for consumers who get a positive result on a blood stool test and need to follow up with a colonoscopy. The federal government hasn’t clarified whether that procedure is considered part of the free screening process or whether insurers can charge for it as a diagnostic procedure, Howard and Doroshenk say.

In a 2012 study, researchers found that four insurers imposed patient cost sharing for colonoscopies after a positive blood stool test and three did not.

As for consumers who paid for anesthesia and now learn that they shouldn’t have been charged, it’s unclear if they can get their money back.

“Our expectation is that those who have received a bill for anesthesia this plan year may be able to appeal, but not for previous years,” Howard and Doroshenk said.

The Department of Health and Human Services didn’t respond to a request for clarification.

Please contact Kaiser Health News to send comments or ideas for future topics for the Insuring Your Health column.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.