Although Smoking Has Declined, Its Consequences Haven’t, Study Finds

Smoking has long been associated with increased risks of cancer, but a research team has now estimated the number of deaths from a wide variety of cancers that are linked to cigarette use.

According to a study published Monday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine, almost half of the 346,000 deaths from 12 different types of cancers in individuals 35 years of age or older in 2011 were attributable to smoking cigarettes.

The authors cited the 2014 U.S. Surgeon General’s Report as a preface to their study, which provided estimates on the annual number of smoking-related deaths from cancer overall and from lung cancer specifically between 2005 and 2009.

Although other studies have looked at lung cancer deaths related to smoking, the researchers wrote that this was the first study to delineate the number of deaths from 11 other cancers that were associated with cigarettes.

The study was led by Rebecca L. Siegel of the Intramural Research Department at the American Cancer Society.

Siegel and her team demonstrated that smoking behavior as well as the correlation between smoking and cancer have changed over time. Between 2000 and 2012, the number of people who smoked decreased from 23 to 18 percent and the number of deaths for most types of cancer tied to smoking has also fallen.

Despite these positive statistics, the risk for cancer in individuals who smoke may increase over time.

“The bottom line is that despite 50 years of declining smoking prevalence, almost 170,000 cancer deaths each year are still caused by smoking,” Siegel said.

So the researchers sought to define the magnitude of risk for each of the different types of cancer.

Not surprisingly, of the 12 cancers studied in relation to cigarette smoking, lung, bronchus, and trachea cancers were found to be the most closely associated with this habit. However, half of the deaths from oral cavity, esophagus, and urinary bladder cancers were attributed to smoking as well.

The researchers concluded that to reduce the rates of cancer mortality caused by smoking behavior, there needs to be more extensive control of tobacco.

The best way to accomplish this goal, in Siegel’s opinion, is to “focus targeted tobacco control on groups that are most likely to smoke,” such as low-income people, gay and lesbian populations, and residents of Southern states known for tobacco production.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Legislative Update, June

PSNA continues to monitor the ongoing discussions surrounding the State budget. One of those discussions is a proposal by Governor Wolf to expand the State sales tax to include home healthcare services, nursing and residential care facilities, and ambulatory healthcare services. We believe it will negatively impact our most vulnerable populations by compromising patient care, as well as restricting access to vital health care services. At a time when the nation seeks to continue regulatory and legislative paths to lowering the cost of healthcare, these proposed taxes will significantly increase the overall cost of care.

Nursing care, especially in a patient’s home, is necessary for those patients transitioning home following an illness or for those who, due to a medical condition, cannot leave their home. Homecare nursing is also a safe and effective way to deliver affordable coordinated care. According to a press release issued by Governor Tom Wolf’s office on February 27, 2015: “For every month a resident receives care in the community as opposed to a nursing facility, the Commonwealth is able to save $2,457 per month. In expanding home- and community-based services to more than 5,500 residents, the Commonwealth is offsetting more than $162.2 million in nursing care costs.” The imposition of the sales tax may establish a barrier in the utilization of these services and will cause a financial impact on other areas of healthcare delivery. The inability to access vital nursing care services due to an increase in cost may force Pennsylvania’s citizens into overcrowded emergency rooms, which only exacerbates the cost of healthcare.

Yuma Regional Medical Center

Your Health. Your Hospital. Yuma Regional Medical Center Yuma Regional Medical Center is a not-for-profit, 406-bed facility nationally known for its leading edge technology, excellent patient-family centered care and high employee satisfaction. We’re proud of the caring culture we’ve created for our employees. We offer competitive pay, an outstanding employee appreciation program and excellent benefits. […]

The post Yuma Regional Medical Center appeared first on The Gypsy Nurse.

AaNA/PRN Reaches Tentative Agreement with PAMC

ALASKA NURSES ASSOCIATION (AaNA) / PROVIDENCE REGISTERED NURSES (PRN) has reached a Tentative Agreement with PAMC
Ratification vote taking place this Thursday & Friday, next Monday & Tuesday

Please plan on attending the next PRN Membership Meeting:
THURSDAY, JUNE 18TH AT 4:00 PM
Join us on the deck at 3:00 PM for food and fellowship with your colleagues
Click here to see a brief summary of the last meeting
Click here to view the agenda for Thursday


ALTHOUGH WE HAVE REACHED A TENTATIVE AGREEMENT, OUR WORK IS NOT DONE:

YOU (the members) still have to ratify the agreement. You will get a chance to vote on whether or not to accept the agreement. We will be holding informational meetings on the proposed contract changes. It is important that you (yes, you!) all attend these meetings in order to find out about OUR contract changes.



Only FULL AaNA members are eligible to vote, but we welcome all nurses covered by the AaNA/PAMC contract to come hear about the proposed changes for 2015-2018. Members of the negotiating team will be present to explain and take feedback on the work we have done.
INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS & RATIFICATION VOTE DATES & TIMES:
Please drop by at any time convenient for you



THURSDAY, JUNE 18TH — 10 AM to 9 PM at AaNA Office
FRIDAY, JUNE 19TH — 2 PM to 9 PM at PAMC West Auditorium
MONDAY, JUNE 22ND — 10 AM to 9 PM at PAMC West Auditorium
TUESDAY, JUNE 23RD — 7:30 AM to 8 PM at AaNA Office




AaNA is located at 3701 E. Tudor Road, Suite 208. (Just West of Elmore)

Please call for directions or with questions: 907-274-0827




The 2015 AaNA/PRN and PAMC negotiating teams have worked very hard to reach what we believe is a fair 3-year contract. Negotiations proceeded with compromises on both sides during these difficult and uncertain times for the healthcare industry.




BIG CHANGES / HIGHLIGHTS OF THE AGREEMENT INCLUDE:

-Changes in Registry language, including scheduling and on-call

-Preceptor vs. Orientor definitions and pay

-New language protecting breastfeeding mothers

-Changes in consecutive shifts

-Continuation of PTO & Sick Time as is

-LEAVE: New language and/or new types of leave for: bereavement leave, personal leave, educational leave of absence, company medical leave

-Parental Leave for non-FMLA-eligible nurses

-New language for injury prevention & safe patient handling


Your Negotiating Team believes that this is a strong contract and recommends ratification!

2015 PRN Negotiating Team
Terra Colegrove, PRN President
Jane Erickson, PRN Vice President
Donna Phillips, PRN Treasurer
Joe Peacott, PRN Grievance Officer
Julie Eib, PRN Grievance Officer
Robin Savage, Contract Action Team Member
Mike Tedesco, Labor Attorney

For Doctors Who Take A Break From Practice, Coming Back Can Be Tough

After taking a 10-year break from practicing medicine to raise four sons, Kate Gibson was ready to go back to work.

The family practitioner had been reading about a shortage of primary care doctors and knew she could help. But when Gibson, 51, applied to work at her former hospital near Los Angeles, she was turned away. She’d been out of clinical practice too long.

“I really thought it was not going to be that hard,” she said.

Like many professionals, physicians take time off to raise children, care for sick family members or to recover from their own illnesses. Some want to return from retirement or switch from non-clinical jobs back to seeing patients. But picking up where they left off is more difficult in medicine than in most careers.

In medicine, change occurs quickly. Drugs, devices and surgical techniques that were standard a decade ago may now be obsolete. Or a returning doctor’s skills may simply be rusty.

“My hands feel like those of an intern,” said Molly Carey, 36, an Ivy-League educated doctor who recently enrolled in a Texas retraining program after four years away from patients.

After extended leaves, doctors must convince medical boards to reissue their licenses, hospitals to grant admitting privileges and malpractice insurers to provide coverage. Only a handful of programs around the country are set up to help physicians brush up on their skills, and they can cost doctors thousands of dollars.

“Medical schools do a fantastic job graduating brand new medical students,” said Humayun J. Chaudhry, president of the Federation of State Medical Boards. “But what about people who have already graduated and need to get some retraining? There is a clearly a dearth of those kind of training programs.”

Policymakers and professional organizations are pushing to make the process less burdensome and costly – in part because it may help ease shortages of primary care doctors.

Getting experienced doctors to dust off their white coats is cheaper than starting from scratch, said Robert Steele, director of KSTAR physician programs at Texas A&M Health Science Center. He oversees a mini-residency program at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, in which returning doctors divide their time between seeing patients and attending classes. The three-month training includes the latest on medications, procedures, disease management and treatments.

“They just need polishing up to practice safely and competently,” Steele said.

Patient safety advocates argue that minimum standards should be set to ensure that doctors coming back after a hiatus are providing the best care possible. As it stands, no nationwide standards or requirements exist, and states have different requirements.

“Patients would like to think that any doctor who is seeing them or doing procedures on them is at the height of their career,” said Joe Kiani, founder of the Patient Safety Movement Foundation. “If a doctor has been out for a while, they are not.”

Carey, 36, had a great education, graduating from medical school at the University of Pennsylvania and completing a residency in 2011 in obstetrics and gynecology at Brown University and a Providence hospital. But after taking just four years off to care for a sick grandmother and another relative, she felt she needed to freshen her clinical skills. So she moved from Rhode Island to Texas to take part in the KSTAR program, hoping to gain more confidence as a surgeon and become more marketable.

Setting Standards and Removing Obstacles

Reliable numbers of how many doctors suspend their practices aren’t available, but the American Medical Association estimated in 2011 that 10,000 doctors could reenter practice each year.

The Federation of State Medical Boards wants states to create a standard process for physicians to show they have the skills to return to medicine. It is asking licensing agencies to track whether doctors are still practicing and whether it is in their area of training.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the AMA also are trying to remove obstacles for doctors who want to return to work after taking time off. And John Sarbanes, a Maryland congressman, has proposed legislation to help expand re-entry programs for primary care doctors and help cover physicians’ costs if they agree to practice in high-need areas.

After hitting a wall with her former employer and others, Gibson enrolled in an online retraining program in San Diego, which cost her $7,000. She spent four months completing the courses last year and a week shadowing a family physician. Then she took a written exam and was evaluated during mock visits with “patients” played by actors.

In the end, she received two certificates — one from the program and one from UC San Diego School of Medicine for 180 hours of continuing medical education.

“I definitely felt more confident,” Gibson said. But she still wanted more hands-on clinical training. So she recently started a paid fellowship at the USC Department of Family Medicine, seeing patients under the oversight of other doctors.

Former medical school professor Leonard Glass created the San Diego program, called the Physician Retraining & Reentry Program, in 2013. Besides retraining primary care doctors, the online program has attracted specialists who wanted to switch to primary care and restless retirees.

“Some are simply tired of being retired,” he said. “It’s sort of an itch to go back to taking care of people.”

‘Expensive And Time-Consuming’

Several retraining programs are run by hospitals, including Cedars Sinai Medical Center. There, participants spend between six weeks and three months seeing patients under the supervision of other physicians, then discuss their cases in an exit interview to demonstrate what they learned. They leave with a letter that can be submitted to employers or hospitals.

The Cedars program costs $5,000 a month. Leo A. Gordon, who runs it, said some doctors who call to inquire are angry about having to spend the time and money when they already have so much education and experience. But he said others are simply appreciative that “there is a way to get back in the game.”

One of the Cedars graduates, Maria DiMeglio decided she wanted to return to practice as an OB/GYN after taking off almost six years to care for her children and her ill mother.

“I thought I was retiring, said DiMeglio, “but I kept my options open.”

She had retained her medical license and kept up with continuing education courses. But she needed to persuade her old hospital, Cedars-Sinai, to give her privileges so she could perform surgeries. The Cedars retraining program, she said, “wasn’t difficult, but it was expensive and time-consuming. Not everyone can do that.”

Hospitals set their own requirements for doctors to get credentials and privileges, but doctors who have been out of practice for more than two years generally must show that they are competent to see patients. Having a certificate from a reentry program helps, said David Perrott, chief medical officer of the California Hospital Association.

Jeff Petrozzino, a 50-year old doctor who trained in pediatrics and neonatology, knows all about that. He ran into difficulty returning to clinical practice after spending several years doing health economics research.

“I was a double board-certified physician licensed in several states,” he said. “You would think I would be able to get a job.”

When he finally did get an offer at a medical center in New Jersey, he said both the job and the state medical license were contingent on him getting retrained. He completed a three-month program at Drexel University College of Medicine in 2013, where he was surprised to discover many other doctors in a similar situation.

Petrozzino said he was grateful for the program — but given the hassles of re-entry he would advise doctors to plan carefully before taking breaks from their practice.

“Careers are interrupted or derailed for various reasons,” he said. “The system does not readily allow for re-entry.”

agorman@kff.org

Blue Shield of California Foundation helps fund KHN coverage in California.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Fast Track/TPP Stalled Today. We Must Kill it for Good!

To protect the public health, please call Congress NOW  

Nurses and supporters have never had a more critical time to hold our ground! In an important vote, Fast Track authority was stalled on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives today. But the corporate opponents of public health are pushing for a reconsideration either on Monday or Tuesday. We must act this weekend to stop Fast Track for good—as it could pave the way for corporations to overturn nurse-to-patient ratios, for medication costs to skyrocket, and other public health threats.

“Today Congress did right by the American people, protecting jobs, public health, the environment and our very democracy against a secret trade deal that would complete the corporate take over of our country,” said NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro. “Unfortunately this vote was only a temporary stay of execution for our economy and a second vote will be held next week.”

That’s why nurses across the country need to redouble their efforts this weekend to make sure that every member of Congress hears directly from a Registered Nurse to hold the line and vote No on this disastrous trade deal.

Ways you can help:

Call your Congressmember – Tell him/her to vote “No” on reconsideration and “No” on moving Fast Track forward. If you get voicemail, leave a message!

Click here to call

Click here to email

Here’s what you need to know: The House voted Friday on a three-part bill that would enable the dangerous Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) to be “Fast Tracked” through Congress. The three-part “Fast Track” bill was stopped when one major provision—Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)—was voted down. The clear “No” vote on TAA should have imperiled the entire package.

However, there will be a motion to reconsider TAA early next week.  If the vote on TAA is reversed, Fast Track will become law. We must keep pressure on Congress NOW. For the health of the public and planet—please contact your representative today and say, “No reconsideration, no to moving Fast Track forward!” Let’s make this win official! Tell Congress “No Reconsideration, No Fast Track”! 

Thank you,

Jean Ross, RN       Karen Higgins, RN       Deborah Burger, RN
National Nurses United
Council of Presidents

CA License Delays: Continues to be a hurdle for Travel Nurses

CA is still experiencing extreme delays in licensing for RN’s. I’ve attempted contact with them to no avail to obtain additional information for you – the potential CA RN candidate – to move this process forward in a more expedient manner. If/When I receive any additional information, I will update you. In the meantime, some […]

The post CA License Delays: Continues to be a hurdle for Travel Nurses appeared first on The Gypsy Nurse.

Is this the End of the Charge Nurse as We Know It?

Mat Keller headshot
By Mathew Keller RN JD, Regulatory and Policy Nursing Specialist

It is with growing concern that MNA has received reports of increasingly ineffective charge nurse utilization in our hospitals.  If you’ve been in nursing for more than a few years, you’ve seen the trend yourself: charge nurses have quickly gone from having no patient assignment, to having a few admits or discharges as needed, to always having half of an assignment, to always having a full assignment… to having two floors?

This alarming new trend is to assign the nurse variously described as a given unit’s “resource,” “foreperson,” and “air-traffic controller” to two units at once. This disastrous model stretches already thin nurse staffing even thinner while eliminating an essential resource for both routine and emergency nursing care. Furthermore, it requires the charge nurse to be in two places at once while making safe, accurate, and timely staff assignments without knowing half the staff being assigning.

When a hospital requires a charge nurse to take on a full patient load, or to be in two places at once, that hospital is putting its bottom line ahead of patient safety. This is dangerous for both the hospital and the charge nurse. In fact,  many experienced nurses are now turning down charge nurse assignments due to their unwillingness to take on the legal risk such unsafe assignments entail.

Charge nurses are essential tools to ensure the right nurse is assigned to the right patient, to help navigate crisis situations, and to ensure care that would otherwise be missed is performed. As one researcher put it, the role of a charge nurse is a “skillful balancing act.” But how can one perform a skillful balancing act on two floors at once?

Is this the end of the charge nurse as we know it? Maybe. It’s up to nurses to stand strong together: do not accept unsafe charge nurse assignments. Do not enable your facility to cut corners and put patients at risk. Do not perform your skillful balancing act with a full patient load on two floors at once. Our patients deserve better.